Republicans aiming to pass legislation addressing the country’s opioid crisis and Zika epidemic before skipping town to campaign with the summer are running into a nettlesome problem: Senate Democrats.
The Senate minority blocked a $1.1 billion Zika funding proposal as a result of anything they called “poison pill” riders the 2009 week. And now, as Republicans try and summary House and Senate conference negotiations on fighting the spread of heroin and prescription pill addiction, Democrats are demanding that Republicans plow new funding into combating opioids.
Story Continued Below
“We believe you’ve got to walk the walk, not only talk the talk. And doing every one of these changes without funding? Law enforcement needs more funding, treatment needs more funding,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer of recent York. Republicans “talk about it simply because they know it is a real problem they wouldn’t like to fund it mainly because they be aware of the hard right does not want to finance anything.”
Asked in the event that could tank niche from the Senate, in which the GOP need no less than six Democratic votes, Schumer replied: “I hope not. But we require funding.”
Democrats’ renewed demands for appropriating new spending, and not authorizing spending however, not actually providing new funds, can have serious political implications for Republicans. Various Senate Republicans running in tough reelection races have touted their leadership over the opioid legislation; a breakdown in July would negate that feature.
Still, perhaps it will prove hard for rank-and-file Democrats to vote against a bill cast for a solution to your country’s drug epidemic.
Republicans seemed blindsided by the latest Democratic tactics. A senior Republican aide said the bipartisan, bicameral conference negotiations were around bearing fruit. On Wednesday evening, Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, one of the chief backers from the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act, stated that haggling over money isn’t going to manage into your market.
"It may conclude policy differences between House and Senate version. I’m confident that we will reach one’s destination," said Portman, that has already run reelection ads on his focus on the opioid legislation. "We’re 95 percent of methods there, There’s no doubt that.”
Anti-addiction advocates who are procured the bill’s outcome say the only differences regarding the bills were add-ons from the House, none that were controversial. Following that, truly the only difference ends money.
“That’s a difficulty – a greater portion of an issue inside the house than it really is within the Senate – from the standpoint of developing sure everything’s covered high isn’t mandatory funding,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), among the list of conferees.
The conferees from the House and Senate are due to meet to the legislation on July 6 at 10 a.m., and Democrats are sharpening their strategy ahead in readiness. Schumer and Reid were set in order to reach privately with White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell on Thursday. Congress will break for your summer by mid-July and not return until September.
“We’re about to deal with a lot of those problems. We intend to aim to come up with something,” Reid said. “We have methods of looking after this, fat Republicans should get it over the crazy House of Representatives.”
Senate Democrats happen to be cast by Republicans as hypocrites for blocking the $1.1 billion Zika bill recently after clamoring for lots more funding for months. They voted that bill upon Tuesday over how it was purchased also, since this hadn’t include funding to see relatives planning services, after Planned Parenthood urged Democrats to shoot on the bill.
“Democrats are in work challenging to spin this, but families will not want excuses, they desire action,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Wednesday. “Senate Democrats heard needs of a partisan special interest group and turned their backs on women’s health and fighting Zika.”
Republicans may use the same argument against Democrats if they vote along the opioid bill, particularly due to the fact an excellent single Democrat voted against legislation that didn’t include new spending recording. However, on that same bill, Democrats tried to fasten a $600 million supplemental spending package devised by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H. The amendment failed, 48-47, garnering the support of just three Republicans: Portman, Sen. Kelly Ayotte of the latest Hampshire and Susan Collins of Maine.
Congress may additionally drum up new anti-drug funds in spending bills, though those are unlikely to become law before the fall.
White House officials are usually siding with Senate Democrats looking to ratchet up pressure on Republicans to provide more funding, according to a Senate aide, though officials have told anti-addiction advocates it isn’t seeking to slow into your market down.