Two House Committees on Monday asked the Justice Department to check out whether Hillary Clinton perjured herself over the email controversy while testifying before Benghazi Committee investigators in October.
Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) sent the referral towards U.S. attorney for that District of Columbia, asking him to probe claims Clinton made within the hearing last fall which have proved false.
Story Continued Below
Clinton testified, including, that she neither sent nor received emails marked classified, knowning that she surrended her work-related emails for the State Department. FBI Director James Comey said those statements were wrong during a hearing last week. She did receive some emails with classified markings, he was quoted saying; his agents found them on their investigation. And discovered numerous work-related messages her lawyers still did not income, he explained.
“The evidence collected with the FBI during its investigation of Secretary Clinton’s by using a personal email system generally seems to directly contradict several elements of her sworn testimony,” the committee chairmen wrote. “In light of people contradictions, the Department should investigate and see whether they should call prosecute Secretary Clinton for violating statutes that prohibit perjury and false statements to Congress, as well as other relevant statutes.”
The Justice Department, run by the National government, isn’t likely to do something for the referral. However the missive suggests Republicans do not have goal of dialing back their protest in the FBI’s refusal to prosecute Clinton, or their criticism on the presumed Democratic nominee on her behalf email set-up.
Democrats, meanwhile, blasted Republicans to get sore losers since the FBI has decided against recommending charges for my child.
“Republicans are really frustrated using the FBI’s unanimous decision that they’re now completely unloading on Secretary Clinton with everything they’ve got- right before the presidential conventions," said Oversight ranking Democrat Elijah Cummings (D-Md.). "They are spending their final days here in Washington climbing all over one… Republicans are squandering much more taxpayer dollars in the desperate try to save this issue alive create down Secretary Clinton’s poll numbers before election.”
Chaffetz is usually asking Comey to convert over the FBI’s full investigative file within the issue, which may
presumably allow lawmakers to evaluate what she told the FBI with the information she told to Congress.
Also Monday, Goodlatte and Benghazi Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C) sent formed to Comey, signed by 200 House Republicans, seeking more answers about his decisions not to ever advice that Clinton be prosecuted.
While Comey said there was clearly clear evidence that Clinton was “extremely careless” and mishandled classified information, he explained there is not any precedent for prosecuting a situation like Clinton’s without proof of her intent to violate legal issues. Both lawmakers, however, argue that “there is precedent for prosecution," citing in instances where a Marine was found accountable for "gross negligence."
“You appear to have picked a completely new standard outside of nothing – ‘extreme carelessness’ – to clarify the actions of Secretary Clinton and her staff,” the two write. “We do not understand being forced to have cited any loss of set on fault Secretary Clinton when the law sets forth a felony violation for something fewer than intentional conduct C ‘gross negligence.'”
The letter continues: “As an ancient prosecutor, please explain knowing about it with the legal distinction actions performed with ‘gross negligence’ and the ones done ‘extremely carelessly.’ How would you determine that ‘extreme carelessness’ would not equal ‘gross negligence?'”